The Lithium Dilemma: Balancing Economic Development, Indigenous Rights, and Sovereignty in Argentina

The world stands on the cusp of a clean energy revolution, and lithium has emerged as a critical resource in powering this transition. Argentina, endowed with a multitude of lithium reserves, finds itself in a favorable position in the global race toward cleaner energy sources. with lithium-ion batteries being one of the core clean energy technologies that power electric vehicles and store renewable energy. This provides Argentina with a unique and lucrative opportunity as the country continues to grapple with significant economic challenges, including a substantial debt owed to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) worth over $40 billion. The mounting pressure on the Argentine government to harness its lithium resources for economic development is undeniable. However, this pursuit raises profound legal and ethical questions as lithium sits at the home of indigenous tribes and their land. 

First, lithium mining often requires extensive extraction methods, resulting in air and water pollution, land degradation, and potential for groundwater contamination. For instance, it takes approximately 500,000 gallons of water per ton of lithium,leading to extreme water shortages and hence significantly hinders local farmers from growing crops and maintaining livestock. Ultimately, lithium mining can have profound and adverse impacts on indigenous communities. These impacts encompass the displacement of communities from their ancestral lands, the destruction of sacred sites, environmental degradation affecting livelihoods, health concerns, economic disparities, social disruption, cultural erosion, and a lack of meaningful consultation and consent. 

 While it is clear that lithium mining can cause harmful environmental impacts among indigenous communities, the economic benefits are undeniable for some tribes. In regions where lithium deposits are found, mining operations can bring economic opportunities, such as job creation and potential revenue for local governments. For some indigenous individuals, these job opportunities can provide much-needed income and alleviate poverty, improving their overall quality of life. Additionally, the revenue generated from lithium mining can support community development initiatives, such as infrastructure improvements, education, and healthcare services.

Although there is no unified consensus among the indigenous community regarding how to deal with their resources, the Argentine government has already violated their autonomy by deciding on behalf of the indigenous community without their consent. Previously, Argentina recognized the rights of indigenous communities to communal property and self-determination over their lands, as per international conventions like ILO Convention 169 and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP). These rights encompass the authority to decide how their lands and resources are used, particularly in relation to extractive activities. However, the concept of free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) is not adequately regulated in Argentine domestic law, resulting in inconsistent implementation.

Unfortunately, Argentina's lithium-rich province of Jujuy has witnessed significant constitutional reforms in recent years. In June 2023 the governor of Jujuy, Gerardo Morales modified a previous article that tilted the balance of power between private property rights and the social function of land. The original article expressed that “the right to private property may not be exercised in opposition to the social function or the detriment of health, security, freedom or human dignity.” This move has far-reaching implications as it is an act of infringement over indigenous communities’ rights. Moreover, Morales also added that “the non-consensual occupation by one or more persons that prevents the owner of the property from exercising his rights under this Constitution shall be considered a serious violation of the right to property.” To this end, it establishes the “prohibition of street blockades and roadblocks, as well as all other disturbances to the right to the free movement of persons and the improper occupation of public buildings.” The new Constitution protects itself, in turn, from the protests of the affected communities, since it considers that the state must ensure “democratic coexistence” through the protection of the rights of all persons. In addition, an article guaranteeing ancestral rights of the indigenous communities over their territories was removed and replaced by another article establishing that the state will promote the delivery of other lands for the development of the affected communities. These new set of reforms created a new precedent for indigenous groups and Argentine democracy. 

The indigenous communities themselves have criticized the maneuver, which does not adhere to the intercultural requirements outlined in the ILO Convention 169 and Law 24,071. Additionally, it does not represent a genuine consultation process. As a result, the National Government asserts that there has not been a thorough, extended dialogue between the provincial State and indigenous representatives, which is essential for a free consultation and participation process. Ultimately, the reform enables lithium extraction in indigenous territories and criminalizes social protest, among other rights violations.

While it is clear that the Argentine government has violated tribal rights, they need to ensure that indigenous voices are heard moving forward. The exploitation of natural resources should not disproportionately benefit external corporations or the government while leaving indigenous communities in poverty. As of now, many tribes have been left out of the conversation of money. Ensuring that indigenous tribes receive most, if not all, of the funds generated from resource extraction is a step towards rectifying historical injustices and promoting social and economic equity. 

____________

1 Rosario, Jorgelina Do. “Why Argentina, IMF Are Wrestling over Bad Debt, Again: Quicktake.” Bloomberg.com, (January 16, 2022). https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-16/why-argentina-imf-are-wrestling-over-bad-debt-again-quicktake?utm_medium=cpc_search&utm_campaign=NB_ENG_DSAXX_DSAXXXXXXXXXX_EVG_XXXX_XXX_Y0469_EN_EN_X_BLOM_GO_SE_XXX_XXXXXXXXXX&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIvaLu1-nigQMV7AGtBh1_AAemEAAYAiAAEgI7f_D_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds.

2 Zheng, March. “The Environmental Impacts of Lithium and Cobalt Mining.” Earth.Org, (June 21, 2023). https://earth.org/lithium-and-cobalt-mining/#:~:text=Though%20emissions%20deriving%20from%20mining,and%20potential%20for%20groundwater%20contamination.

3 Ahmad, Samar. “The Lithium Triangle: Where Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia Meet.” Harvard International Review, (January 18, 2020). https://hir.harvard.edu/lithium-triangle/#:~:text=This%20has%20not%20only%20created,the%20already%20limited%20water%20supply.

4 Interim. “Argentina’s Lithium Is at the Heart of Tensions with Indigenous Communities.” Le Monde.fr, (August 1, 2023). https://www.lemonde.fr/en/environment/article/2023/08/01/lithium-at-the-heart-of-tensions-with-indigenous-communities-of-argentina_6075800_114.html#:~:text=The%20Jujuy%20peoples%E2%80%99%20demands%20are,work%2C%22%20added%20the%20sociologist.

5 Marchegiani, Pia et al, “Lithium Extraction in Argentina: A Case Study on the Social and Environmental Impacts,” Farn, Argentina. https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/e5cbbdb75aa9c4ba8ddcf919d2b1e35931e232ef.pdf 

6 Raus M. Diego, “Constitution, Extractivism and Conflict in Jujuy (Argentina),” Latinoamérica21. (August 5, 2023). https://latinoamerica21.com/en/constitution-extractivism-and-conflict-in-jujuy-argentina/

7 “The national government presented a declaratory action of unconstitutionality against the reform of the Constitution of Jujuy promoted by Governor Morales,” Argentina.gob.ar. (June 30, 2023). https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/el-gobierno-nacional-presento-una-accion-declarativa-de-inconstitucionalidad-contra-la 

8 “The Jujuy rebellion against the colonial lithium chain,” Tierra Viva Agencia de Noticias. (July 26, 2023). https://agenciatierraviva.com.ar/la-rebelion-jujena-ante-la-cadena-colonial-del-litio/

9 Frankel C., Todd and Whoriskey Peter, “Tossed Aside in the ‘White Gold’ Rush,” Washington Post. (December 19, 2016). https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/business/batteries/tossed-aside-in-the-lithium-rush/